![]() |
Breast Cancer Walk for the Princess
Margaret Hospital Foundation.
|
The drug, geldanamycin, is well known for attacking a protein associated with the spread of breast cancer. However, a laboratory-based study found it also degraded a different protein that triggers blood vessel growth.
Stopping unwanted blood vessel growth
is a key challenge in the battle against cancer, according to Dr
Sreenivasan Ponnambalam, reader in human disease biology in the
University of Leeds' Faculty of Biological Sciences.
"This is potentially very
significant because tumours secrete substances that stimulate blood
vessels to develop around them, forming networks that supply
nutrients and provide pathways for spread around the body," Dr
Ponnambalam said. "This is one of the big problems in cancer:
how can we stop the tumour growing and spreading through these blood
vessel networks?"
There are already other drugs available
that try to stop this growth. One type tries to attack directly the
membrane protein VEGFR2, which is essential for new blood vessel
growth. However, that approach carries the risk of serious
side-effects because proteins in the membrane walls of blood vessels
do important work such as controlling blood pressure.
Geldanamycin offers a novel and
potentially safer solution because it suppresses the protein
indirectly.
The new study, based on experiments
with human cells and different animal models, found that geldanamycin
indirectly triggered the clearance of the VEGFR2 protein by
activating a cellular quality-control system that breaks down many
proteins.
That quality-control system already
degrades VEGFR2 relatively slowly but the drug accelerates the
process, preventing activation of the protein and inappropriate new
blood vessel formation.
"With conventional treatments, we
have been trying to deal with the situation after the switch has been
thrown. What this drug does is destroy the key part of the switch
before that switch is thrown," Dr Ponnambalam said.
"Geldanamycin and chemical
derivatives have been under intensive study in the laboratory and in
clinical trials for the past 20 years. The cost to the NHS or
patients could be relatively low compared to the expensive existing
anti-cancer drugs, which are still under patent," Dr Ponnambalam
added.
The two-year study involved researchers
in the University of Leeds and University College London. It was
funded by The Wellcome Trust. The paper is published in the
journal PLOS ONE.
No comments:
Post a Comment