![]() |
Credit: Ranjith Siji
|
More than half of all couches tested in a Duke University-led study contained potentially toxic or untested chemical flame retardants that may pose risks to human health.
Among the chemicals detected was
"Tris," a chlorinated flame retardant that is considered a
probable human carcinogen based on animal studies.
"Tris was phased out from use in
baby pajamas back in 1977 because of its health risks, but it still
showed up in 41 percent of the couch foam samples we tested,"
said Heather Stapleton, associate professor of environmental
chemistry at Duke's Nicholas School of the Environment.
In many cases, the manufacturer may not
know what chemicals have been used. Most manufacturers buy their foam
padding from a vendor who, in turn, buys the chemicals used to treat
it from another vendor. The identity of the chemical flame retardants
often gets lost along the way, or is protected under law as
proprietary.
Stapleton and her colleagues analyzed
102 polyurethane foam samples from couches purchased for home use in
the United States between 1985 and 2010. They published their
findings in a peer-reviewed study released Wednesday in the
journal Environmental Science & Technology.
In addition to finding Tris, the tests
revealed that 17 percent of the foam samples contained the
flame-retardant pentaBDE, which is banned in 172 countries and 12
U.S. states and was voluntarily phased out by U.S manufacturers in
2005.
PentaBDEs are long-lasting chemicals
that over time migrate into the environment and accumulate in living
organisms. Studies show they can disrupt endocrine activity and
affect thyroid regulation and brain development. Early exposure to
them has been linked to low birth weight, lowered IQ and impaired
motor and behavioral development in children.
PentaBDE and Tris were the only flame
retardants found in couches purchased before 2005. After 2005, Tris
was the most common flame retardant found. In addition, Stapleton and
her colleagues identified two new flame-retardant chemical mixtures
in more recently purchases couches for which there is little or no
health data available.
"Overall, we detected
flame-retardant chemicals in 85 percent of the couches we tested and
in 94 percent of those purchased after 2005," Stapleton said.
"More than half of all samples, regardless of the age of the
couch, contained flame retardants that are potentially toxic or have
undergone little or no independent testing for human health risks."
"If a couch has a California TB
117 label, you can all but guarantee it contains chemical flame
retardants," Stapleton said. "But this is where labeling
requirements get confusing: the lack of a TB 117 label on a couch
does not guarantee the absence of chemical flame retardants. It's not
that cut-and-dried."
Stapleton said that so many new
proprietary chemical flame retardants have been introduced in recent
years that it has become very difficult for scientists to identify
them all or determine their presence consumer products.
Co-authors of the study were Smitri
Sharma, Gordon Getzinger and P. Lee Ferguson of Duke's Nicholas
School of the Environment; Thomas Webster of Boston University School
of Public Health; and Michelle Gabriel and Arlene Blum of the Green
Science Policy Institute and the University of California-Berkeley.
Funding for the study came from the
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and a private
donation to the Nicholas School from Fred and Alice Stanback.
No comments:
Post a Comment