Technology can serve as a tool to
bridge the digital divide, but it is unlikely to be a complete
solution in helping people find jobs and escape poverty, according to
a Penn State researcher.
"People really want to believe
that the latest technology will help us do all these great things and
liberate us," said Michelle Rodino-Colocino, assistant professor
of communications and women's studies. "But it's also a way of
putting off the big problems and saying, 'let's not touch these big
problems because Internet access will turn it all around for us.' "
The organizers of the
Neighborhoodworks.net project named the ideal recipient of the
program Vanessa, who was both a real person, as well as a
representative of the demographic that the group wanted to serve.
Vanessa was low-income mother of four, who did not have a car or
access to childcare.
"It's really a digital divide
argument," explained Rodino-Colocino, who presents her findings
at the National Communication Association, today (Nov. 16) in
Orlando, Fla. "But it's also a typical post-welfare argument
that tries to avoid the political and larger structural problems and
accepts the attacks on welfare as a given."
The project, conceived in 1999, was
expected to become operational in 2007. While the computer training
did receive funding and was provided by a local human services
agency, the plan to provide free WiFi to the community failed.
Rodino-Colocino said that even if the
free WiFi service was rolled out, she doubted the technology would
solve the problems of the project's participants.
"It's a classic
pick-yourself-up-by-your-bootstraps -- or internet connections, in
this case -- type of program," the researcher said. "But it
doesn't address these big problems."
The researcher said there are few
online jobs that pay a living wage. Without a car or childcare, the
participants would still find it difficult to find a job.
"In fact, the participants may
have found themselves even more isolated," the researcher added.
Rodino-Colocino said that political
action, rather than an overreliance on technology, would help
low-income people to solve problems associated with poverty, such as
low wages and limited access to childcare.
To study the project, Rodino-Colocino
attended community meetings on the plan and reviewed the
Neighborhoodworks.net grant application, as well as monitored media
coverage on the plan. She conducted a series of interviews of ten
participants of the program, both during the planning phase of the
project and after the failure to create the WiFi network.
Rodino-Colocino was surprised that even
after the failure to implement the free WiFi system, participants
still had hope that technology would create new employment
opportunities for them. The project seemed to raise self-esteem and
hope, she added.
"The hearts and minds of all those
involved were really in the right place with this,"
Rodino-Colocino said. "When I returned for follow-up interviews,
participants were still hopeful even though these larger issues were
never addressed."
Contact:
No comments:
Post a Comment